Founded Report in London; Authored By: Chris Chase Mortified China and the 2008 Beijing Olympics
LONDON REPORTER, CHRIS CHASE MORTIFIED CHINA AND THE 2008 BEIJING OLYMPICS
Earlier this week; Mr. Chris Chase, a London based reporter who traveled the distant far to reach China in order to witness the 2008 Beijing Olympics did present his observations.
Finding the notes of Chris Chase on the web maybe annoying to many; not only for the over 3 billion readers in China; but the whole world who were stunned what have China done for the Olympics – that is considered by the world as extremely incomparable, beyond norms, beyond compare, more than a magic, so beautiful. And yes, not even Britain and any nation of the world can handle to match the same – when Chris Chase inked in his article @ Yahoo Sports that the presentation of China is FAKE.
Reading the article Chris presented to the public causes sour reactions.
In order to help everyone; all of us to properly respond; to properly present a reaction, an article maybe; the following parameters is helpful.
How to Criticize Effectively
1. Identify the behavior that you want to criticize. Direct your criticism at the action, not the person. The less personal you make your comments, the less likely the person will become defensive and uncooperative.
2. Make criticism specific. Not: “You always miss game reports.” But: “You missed the March 15 game report.” Rash generalizations are counterproductive and tough to prove. The more specific the criticism, the easier it is to justify the criticism.
3. Be sure the behavior you’re criticizing can be changed. Foreign accents, baldness and other similar things cannot always be changed. Pick out specifics the workers can work on and see improvement.
.4. Use “I” and “we” to stress that you want to work out the problem together, rather than making threats. Officiating can be a lonely business. By using “we,” the readers will hopefully feel he/she is not alone in the idea.
5. Make sure the particulars you criticize understand the reason for your criticism is to improve their game style and their ways. Put a positive spin on your comments; they are meant to improve things.
6. Don’t belabor the point. Short and sweet, no lectures. No one likes to be talked down to.
7. Offer incentives for changed of style and systems, therefore producing a better presentations. Offer to help identifying the root to correct the problem. Improved systems can lead to improved opportunities.
8. Don’t set a tone of anger or sarcasm. Both are counterproductive. The more sarcasm used, anger is often true from the readers.
9. Show the public readers that you understand the probable reactions: Assure the readers that things can be changed.
10. If you’re putting your criticism in hard writing, cool off before writing the critical letter or memo. If you write your report shortly after the feeling of denial that you maybe fall from the group of second rated and or of less powerful creation, emotions tend to appear. Take good notes at the situation, then review them before writing a comment and or an article.
11. Start off by saying something good. Assure the readers that what China has and what they have made is one great thing; never in this earth one did have presentations of the same.
12. At the end, reaffirm your support. Reassure the public that you are there to help China improve should it need be.
And for the people of China, congratulations; and the world who are into the blaze of the Olympic 2008 Trends; let us all learn the manners of criticizing.
By: Arvin Gumato Pareja
About the Author:
The Author is an academic person who owns a passion for peace and self development. He who travels the world in search of a well defined political governance; where peace, abundance and security are of bounty.
He owns a strong faith in the theory of self preservation and self trust.
From his own conviction, He value not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumble, or where the doer of deeds could have done better.
He also believes that ones good effort should be credited with recognition that belongs to the man who is in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes short again and again, who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at best knows achievement and who at the worst if he fails at least fails while daring greatly so that his place shall never be like those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat. agp_von@yahoo.com
